For all their misdeeds, Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling were onto something. The stodgy electric power industry is in need of a lot of shaking up. No, they didn’t invent the idea of trading power and power-generating assets around like hog bellies, but they certainly increased the visibility of this kind of trading. And now, five years after Enron’s collapse, merger and acquisition activity in the electric power industry is really picking up steam. You can profit from it.
Trimmer and richer, utilities are now “desperately looking to spend,” says Koen Dierckx, financial analyst at KBC Securities, part of the Belgian KBC banking group. In 2005, 527 deals worth $196 billion were announced, including
The hunt for acquisitions is being driven by the huge capital demands facing power companies over the next quarter century. A rule of thumb in the industry, says Duke Energy Chief James E. Rogers, is that for every dollar in operating and maintenance expense that can be reduced in a merger, up to five dollars can be invested in infrastructure upgrades.
Utilities need to upgrade both the quantity and quality of their systems on a large scale. PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates that $12.7 trillion must be spent worldwide by 2030 on power plants and transmission lines. The International Energy Agency forecasts that the world will consume 28 trillion kilowatt-hours of electricity in 2030, nearly twice the current level of consumption. Nor does anyone want a rerun of the overloading in early November of Germany’s grid that left 10 million Europeans in five countries without power over a weekend, or of the collapse of the rickety North American grid in 2003.
Last year’s repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act removed restrictions on who could run utilities. That opened the door to investors such as Warren Buffett, who bought
Right now the majority of the deals in the power industry are happening in Europe. Western Europeans, jittery about growing dependence on Russia’s Gazprom for natural gas, want to build up power companies of countervailing clout. Meanwhile, the European Commission is trying to create one electricity market across its 25 member countries. It has directed national governments, notably in Spain and France, not to protect former state energy monopolies–now private and meant to stand as “national champions”–when they are the target of foreign bids. Progress is uneven, but regional markets within the EU are forming, deal by deal.
The commission had a big win in getting the Spanish government to drop its opposition to the bid by Germany’s
E.ON has also been active in Central Europe and Scandinavia; it bought Powergen in the U.K. for $14 billion in April 2001. The acquisition spree is one reason that Dierckx likes the stock, which trades as an American Depositary Receipt on the New York Stock Exchange. He says that the $67 billion (2005 sales) company, 33rd on our list of the world’s 2,000 largest public companies, is one of the strongest in the sector because of its stability and natural gas business. The shares sell for 17 times trailing earnings.
Dierckx also likes Italy’s
Even without Enel, Dierckx likes Suez for its exceptional operating performance and the promise in its proposed merger with
More such deals that will let electricity companies become more than passive buyers of gas are expected prior to a July 2007 European Union deadline for all European consumers to be able to select which company will be their preferred gas and electric supplier. The accompanying table contains five of Dierckx’s picks that he believes will benefit from the drive for utility consolidation.

