These days, designing a new mobile phone can seem like something out of an episode of “Dr. Phil.”
LG Electronics, the maker of the Chocolate and Voyager phones, begins by asking focus groups to keep a journal, jotting down feelings about features they like most. Participants can call a toll-free number to share their emotions about the phone they are testing. And sometimes they are asked to draw pictures that represent their mood when they hold the phone.
“Our job is to be behaviorists and psychologists,” said Ehtisham Rabbani, LG’s vice president for product strategy and marketing. “We constantly have to be reminding ourselves that we tend to be geek types and our customers are not.”
Executives and industry analysts say it has become more important than ever to understand the psyche of consumers and why they pick one phone over another. That’s because LG, Motorola, Nokia and others are in a fierce battle to please finicky customers as new entrants like Apple, with its popular iPhone, seek to upend the traditional mobile phone business.
Continue reading the main storyAt stake are millions of dollars in profits and the fortunes of entire companies. Like fashion or entertainment, the cellphone industry is increasingly hit-driven, and new models that do not fly off the shelves within weeks of their debut are considered duds. The most gadget-conscious shoppers buy new phones every nine months, twice as fast as they did a few years ago. And teenagers, one of the fastest-growing markets, are especially quick to dump a brand if it loses popular appeal.
“The world has changed,” said Jeremy Dale, who is in charge of marketing for mobile devices at Motorola, where fortunes tumbled with the decline of its once popular Razr. “There is more relevance in what other consumers say than what the company is saying.”
Cellphone company executives are so concerned about these trends that, at the largest mobile phone trade show in Barcelona this month, panelists debated how their industry could better understand how to make customers happy, as Apple seems to do. One panelist suggested that cellphone makers tap into consumers’ “neural networks”, while another said they should understand their subliminal needs.
Continue reading the main storyThe speed of innovation — or rather, consumers’ appetite for it — makes it harder for companies to compete. Ten years ago, wireless carriers and mobile phone makers could thrive by offering consumers two or three new options a year. But now, with nearly 80 percent of Americans owning a mobile phone and hundreds of models available, a company’s fate can turn as quickly as a teenage girl’s temperament.
Mr. Dale says companies like his are forced to give consumers what they want even before they know they want it. Motorola was a market leader in late 2004 when it introduced the ultraslim Razr. But when the company failed to create a worthy successor, its stock plummeted and investors revolted.
Motorola’s share of handset sales in the United States dropped to 30 percent by the fourth quarter of 2007, from 35 percent in the first quarter, according to the NPD Group, which tracks sales. Now Motorola is considering a breakup of the company.
Different companies, of course, take different approaches to understanding consumer tastes. Along with extensive focus-group testing, LG executives regularly attend home and design shows looking for broader trends in popular culture.
Mr. Rabbani said that last year he and his colleagues noticed that natural materials like wood, metal and leather were popular among furniture and appliance makers. So when designing the Venus, which LG introduced in late 2007, designers molded the plastic back to give it the texture of grainy leather. Verizon and LG declined to give sales figures for the phone.
But whatever the cultural inspiration, if a new phone does not catch on quickly, it is not likely to catch on at all. Even interesting designs do not necessarily spell success. Helio, a joint venture of EarthLink and SK Telecom of South Korea that developed the Ocean and other phones for the youth market, is reported to be looking for a buyer for its business, too.
“The strongest marketing tool is the first 20,000 people who buy the device,” Mr. Dale of Motorola said. “If they like it, they will tell their friends.”
The focus on the consumer mindset can be intense. Three weeks ago, a small team of Nokia executives had their first gathering at a farmhouse 30 miles north of Santa Barbara, Calif., for a three-day retreat to discuss consumer behavior.
The group is the first of its kind at Nokia, the world’s No. 1 seller of mobile phones, bringing together 14 designers and researchers from California and Helsinki, where the company is headquartered. Their charge is to tell Nokia’s top executives not only what consumers will want next year, but 3 to 15 years from now.
“We have the ability to clarify the needs of real people,” said Rhys Newman, who heads the team.
A case in point: A few years ago one of Nokia’s designers visited China and noticed that people there used the light from their mobile phone screens to illuminate dark hallways so they could more easily unlock their doors. After he discussed his observation with other Nokia designers, Nokia added a penlight to some models.
“Design used to be inconsequential: just make it pretty, make it sell,” said Mr. Newman, who, along with three members of his team, was interviewed at Nokia’s design center near a strip mall in downtown Calabasas, north of Los Angeles. Now, he said, “we have to think about human fundamentals.”
Two and a half years ago, Nokia executives asked Mr. Newman and some colleagues to explore what Nokia’s strategy should be as consumers began to personalize their cellphones. Among those working on the project were Jan Chipchase, a human behavior researcher for Nokia who lives in Tokyo and travels the world studying culture and communication, and Andrew Gartrell, a 14-year veteran designer.
On a trip to Ghana last year, a colleague of Mr. Chipchase took a photograph of the crushed front panel of a Nokia 1100 mobile phone that had been discarded in the middle of a dusty road.
Mr. Gartrell, who had helped design the 1100, was unnerved by the image; the phone had just come out in 2003. Mr. Newman said Nokia’s designers and researchers became fixated on the notion that the company makes 16 mobile phones a second and that many of them end up in the garbage heap.
So instead of examining the personalization of phones, Mr. Newman and his fellow designers suggested that Nokia explore how to make more environmentally sound products — or, as Mr. Gartrell put it, “How do we turn waste into something beautiful?”
This month Nokia introduced Remade, a prototype of a mobile phone made entirely out of recycled aluminum cans, old tires and plastic soda bottles. As part of the same initiative, it has also developed a more efficient battery.
Nokia has not announced when the phone or battery will go on sale and is still working on their designs. If they arrive soon, though, Nokia’s marketers could try to ride the wave of eco-friendly products, like the increasingly popular Prius, that have captured consumers’ fancy.
When asked if they felt pressure to design new phones more quickly in an increasingly competitive market, Mr. Chipchase responded with a quizzical stare. “Why do you want to innovate faster?” he asked. “Are you innovating something gimmicky just to sell a product? Or is it saving the planet you are after?”
Not every company lets their designers be so idealistic. Some are more focused on investor expectations for profits than lofty research. “There is an awful lot of pressure to keep the wheels turning instead of putting money into new innovation and development,” said Rita Gunther McGrath, a professor at Columbia Business School who studies innovation at big companies.
And consumers are not the only demanding clients that cellphone makers must please. Wireless carriers like AT&T and Verizon are also customers. In 2004, for example, on the heels of the success of the Apple iPod, every major cellphone maker was experimenting with how to combine a music player with a mobile phone.
Steve McGaw, a senior vice president for AT&T’s wireless operations, said his company, then named Cingular, talked to Motorola about what model it could offer. Cingular was given two choices: the Rokr, which stored 100 songs and was the first mobile phone to work with Apple’s iTunes software, or the popular Razr, which would not incorporate a music player for another year.
Mr. McGaw said AT&T chose the Rokr because Motorola could deliver it quickly. But the phone was criticized for its lackluster design. It was not until Apple introduced the iPhone that consumers embraced such a combination.
AT&T abandoned the Rokr and now offers the iPhone exclusively in the United States. “At the end of the day it’s a judgment call,” Mr. McGaw said. “We don’t always get it right.”
Continue reading the main story
63 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.
Rick in the kitchen
Oakville, ON February 29, 2008Here's a thought. Give me a phone with an intuitive interface, one button access for voice mail, redial, and other routine functions. And give me a phone that is just that - a phone. And concentrate design and development around that goal for at least a few models. Something beyond the bare bones offerings - a premium phone that does that one job exceedningly well.
Tom Spurr
Costa Rica February 29, 2008This cell phone design thing baffles me in the same way that all U.S. marketing does. Baby Boomers represent the largest population segment and the segment with the most disposable income but all of the marketers insist on selling everything to teenagers. The theory, I think has something to do with brand loyalty but recent history is shouting at them that young folks have no brand loyalty. As others above have stated, how about a simple phone that doesn't do anything else but work properly.
Greystone
Trenton, NJ February 29, 2008The old Bell System before divestiture always carefully researched consumer reaction to its services and products before widespread release. Further, it used first-rate industrial designers like Henry Dreyfuss to design its telephone sets to be as human-friendly as possible.
After divestiture, the telecommunications industry focused on 'razzle-dazzle' marketing rather than sound technology. Telephone equipment (both wireless and landline) may be more attractive than the basic black of Bell System days but it is not as reliable nor as comfortable to use.
S L
New York February 29, 2008I yearn for the day that personal cellphone blockers are legal.
Ralph
Palo Alto CA February 29, 2008I just want one that's lighter and smaller.
No camera, no music, no maps, no querty.
Steve Patterson
Boston February 29, 2008I am not emotionally attached to any of my cell phone features. People should understand that a cell phone is 3 or 4 silicon chips, an antenna, a keypad, speaker and microphone - cheap and can be added to anything that has a power supply.
My advice to everyone in this industry is to make what ever it is that you think you do well work and get consumers to adopt it and then add the cell phone to it.
Building a general computing platform and adding cell phone components to it and then trying to make consumers want it is a risky strategy
Charlene
Calgary February 29, 2008A phone is a tool, whether cell or landline. Manufacturers are simply being sensible when they look at how users use the tool they produce. And they are learning; look at the disastrous cellphones from two or three years back. Tiny rocker buttons that were nearly impossible for anyone over 18 to see, let alone use; 'game-ready' features irrelevant for anyone using the phone for communications or work; bright neon colours that weren't as much business-unfriendly as they were adult-unfriendly.
Companies need to realize that the loudest consumers - teenagers and university-age students - aren't the ones buying the majority of phones at any price range. Corporations and adult individuals buy the most phones, and nobody appreciates tools that look cool but are overwhelmingly frustrating to use.
Andy
Chicago February 29, 2008Flexbility. It's not a feature, but the benefit of cell phones I rely upon the most. I can make or change plans on a moments' notice with my wife, colleagues, and friends. I can't imagine how people made plans in the '70s and '80s. If someone was running late, their friends or coworkers would be sitting someplace, waiting for them. Cell phones reduce, if not eliminate, dead time. On balance, I'd say that's a good thing.
Sharon
California February 29, 2008I'm still using my Nokia from several years ago and it works fine. I do sit at lunch with others and watch them compare their new cell phone gadgets. My main concern is with the environmental impact of the enormously short-lived product cycle of all these new gadgets. I applaud the plans of Nokia. I've owned a Toyota for years and when it breaks down, I'll buy a Prius or the best such car. When my Nokia no longer functions as a phone (which is why I purchased it), I'll replace it with a Nokia if the company is following the plan outlined in this article. It's a lifelong attitude of someone in their fifties; it may be old-fashioned but it's "coming back."
yippee1999
NYC February 29, 2008Emotionally attached to? How silly. Now would I be upset if my Contacts disappeared? Sure. But I also have my Contact info stored elsewhere as well. How can someone be emotionally attached to their cell? Get a life people!
Alan Foster
Harrisburg February 29, 2008I switched from Verizon to AT&T because of poor service and delays in contacting Verizon when I had a question or problem. That company is the worst! Now I have an iPhone and I'm happy.
Steve
Minneapolis, MN February 29, 2008True innovation in cell phones will not happen until the phone companies give up much their control their phones and allow the phone manufacturers to design what customers actually want. As it is now most phones are designed so they will have features that bring in the most revenue for the phone companies. The iPhone is so revolutionary because Apple was able to design a phone without all of the restrictions that the other manufacturers face.
beth
fairfax VA February 29, 2008Basically, a cellphone is just a useful tool for keeping in touch, just like a landline phone. It doesn't make sense to be either emotionally attached to one's cellphone, or emotionally condescending/superior toward cellphones and people who use them.
Certainly there are lots of people who cannot seem to get along without their cellphones constantly glued to their ears, and it is annoying to have to overhear the mostly inane conversations. More importantly, every state should have and enforce strict laws against using them while driving; it's extremely dangerous.
However, there are some people, part-time Luddites, who regard cellphones with an almost pathological condescension and disdain; yet these same people are constantly glued to their computers, PDAs, or iPods. Go figure.
Todd
New York City February 29, 2008I've been using my Ericsson T39mc for almost six years. It's small, has great battery life, works in Europe for travel, has Blue-tooth, and well thought out software. Most of the new telephones are medico at best regarding build quality and design. I do like the iPhone and will give it serious consideration when it's available on other networks. In addition, I'm still using my eight, or more, year old Psion Series 5mx as a pocket computer because there's nothing out there with it's important features; large touch screen, usable QWERTY keyboard, instant on, long battery life on AA batteries. All in a fairly small package. While there are some designs I like. Most of the UMPCs aren't instant-on and/or have way too short of a battery life.
Rosie
NYC February 29, 2008I'm looking for a cell phone with a point and shoot feature that will allow me to pulverize all those annoying babbling idiots out there.
"blah, blah, blah"
ZAP!
Rozmarija Grauds
Pennsylvania February 29, 2008Had to give up my cell phone when my provider came out with the new ones which offer music, photos, and texting. I may be immature but dammit I'm an ADULT. I want a TELEPHONE, don't need a pocket amusement park.I've lived a long life and lived it well, and refuse to stand around holding a childish toy.My simple old Nokia, with no contract, is kept charged, for it is said that 911 calls work.
Steve
Radford, Virginia February 29, 2008For those who have old cell phones lying around not being used, donate them to your local women's crisis center. They can use them and you can get a tax deduction.
Jane
NY, NY February 29, 2008I do have an attachment to my cell phone because it was the one way I could frequently communicate with an ex-boyfriend who I was in a long distance relationship with. Even though the person wasn't physically available, access to him was via the cell phone. I think cell phones have changed our expectations of those we are closest to.
Also, from reading other posts, I wonder if there is a gender difference in responses.
Peter B. Wolf, C.E.C.
Farmingdale Maine February 29, 2008Provide me/us with a plain no gimmicks phone, with all buttons to only operate when opened. None on the sides or back to accidentally click. No camera, no messaging, no email, no forwarding, a simple address book and only caller ID as an added feature, large numbers buttons, one voice volume, one type of ringtone: a old fashion bell.
mukul kantharia
maryland February 29, 2008To me cell phones are Good news, bad news scenarios. If it is used for real messaging, it has true value. If it is used in a fashion were it is annoying everybody around you it is a hateful device. I would like to know if people can use jammer in those circumstances. For average person a good network at reasonable price is the most important requirement, PERIOD.
Ana
Sao Paulo, Brazil February 29, 2008- simple, easy to use.
dallastxhollywood
houston, texas February 29, 2008I am so tired of getting a new phone everytime I have to switch companies. I got my first cellphone in 2003 and currently I have 2 phones I no longer use in a drawer and am facing the prospect of a third. I don't want to switch to a new phone, even if it is the same identical phone offered by another company. Because I move a lot (traveling salesman) I need a local area code. What I do not need is another phone.
Whick means the current demand for new phones is a false market.
Cary A. Storchan
Bloomfield Hills, MI February 29, 2008Emotionally attached to a phone? You have to be kidding! A phone is a tool. If you become emotionally attached to it, you become the tool. Or, perhaps, the fool. It's a toss-up.
Gregory
Trumansburg, NY February 29, 2008I still use a Motorola V710 because it gets the best signal. I've tried 5 different phones in the last 3 years and the Cell Phone Companies don't understand I WANT A PHONE THAT GETS A SIGNAL. Or did they forget that's what wireless means!
My 14 year old daughter is a cell phone freak and guess what she and her friends talk about? How good the signal is and how easy is it to txt on the phone?
SIGNAL, SIGNAL, SIGNAL!
Don
Atlanta February 29, 2008I find it ironic that these phone companies are trying to search the collective soul of phone users to compete with the iPhone, whereas Apple engineers went out and built the phone they wanted to use. When it comes to design, a few smart designers beats a phalanx of phocus groups.
63 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.