The full details of recent experiments that made a deadly flu virus more contagious will be published, probably within a few months, despite recommendations by the United States that some information be kept secret for fear that terrorists could use it to start epidemics.
The announcement, made on Friday by the World Health Organization, follows two months of heated debate about the flu research. The recommendation to publish the work in full came from a meeting of 22 experts in flu and public health from various countries who met on Thursday and Friday in Geneva at the organization’s headquarters to discuss “urgent issues” raised by the research.
Most of the group felt that any theoretical risk of the virus’s being used by terrorists was far outweighed by the “real and present danger” of similar flu viruses in the wild, and by the need to study them and freely share information that could help identify the exact changes that might signal that a virus is developing the ability to cause a pandemic, said Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who represented the United States at the meeting.
The natural form of the virus being studied has infected millions of birds, mostly in poor countries in Asia, and although it does not often infect people, it has a high death rate when it does. If the virus were to develop the ability to infect humans more easily, and to spread from person to person — which it almost never does now — it could kill millions of people.
“The group consensus was that it was much more important to get this information to scientists in an easy way to allow them to work on the problem for the good of public health,” Dr. Fauci said. “It was not unanimous, but a very strong consensus.”
But the United States was not part of that consensus, Dr. Fauci said. He said he still agreed with the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, which recommended in December that the research be published only in a redacted form, for safety reasons.
The experiments involve a type of bird flu virus known as H5N1. Of about 600 known cases, more than half have been fatal. The exact death rate is not known, however, because some deaths may go uncounted and mild cases may go undiagnosed. But whatever the death rate turns out to be, most researchers think it will be significantly higher than that of any flu virus, even the notorious 1918 flu, which had a death rate of about 2 percent. The 1918 virus, however, was highly contagious, and killed as many as 50 million people worldwide.
The H5N1 work, paid for by the National Institutes of Health, was done by two separate research teams, at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Research on the viruses was voluntarily suspended by the researchers last month because of the uproar it provoked. News of the experiments, which were conducted last year, set off public fears that the virus could accidentally leak out of a laboratory, or be stolen by terrorists, and result in a devastating pandemic. Scientists have been divided, with some urging that the results be published in full, and others saying the research is so dangerous that it should never even have been done, much less published.
The moratorium on the research and its publication will be extended, probably for several months, according to Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the health organization’s assistant director general for health security and the environment, who spoke at a news conference after the two-day meeting in Geneva.
Dr. Fukuda said that the moratorium would give researchers and officials an opportunity to provide better information to the public about the research and its importance, and would also give safety experts a chance to assess the conditions in which the work is being done.
For now, he said, the group agreed that it was “best that these viruses should stay where they are — in well-run high-security labs.”
The researchers in the Netherlands and Wisconsin made genetic changes in the virus that made it transmissible through the air among ferrets, an animal considered a good model for the way flu behaves in humans. It is not known whether the new virus would be equally contagious in people.
Bruce Alberts, editor of the journal Science, said his journal and another one, Nature, had been planning to publish redacted versions of the research in mid-March. Now, Dr. Alberts said, they will wait until it is considered appropriate to publish the full versions. He said he was surprised that the group meeting in Geneva had reached a decision so promptly.
Continue reading the main story

163 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.
pipet
San Diego February 23, 2012Wow, such FEAR in the comments.
There is more good than bad that can come out of this information. It's not exactly like what they've done is groundbreaking to people in the field. They simply did what many suspect mother nature will do anyway (if she hasn't already - just because we haven't detected it yet doesn't mean it's not there).
It's MUCH better to be prepared to study the effects, lethality, etc so we can be prepared. These strains in the lab can make way for vaccine prep, not to infect people & sell vaccines, but to be prepared for when mother nature DOES strike.
FYI, the publishing of this work will NOT allow some random Joe to make a deadly strain. Most non-scientists won't have the technical ability to understand the article, and while there are capable labs in some rogue states, if they have the inclination to produce this kind of stuff, they can DO IT without these papers being published.
Elizabeth Hart
Australia February 19, 2012Further to my previous comment, some more quotes from Paul Keim’s Q&A with Nature:
“Sialic acids in the respiratory tracts of pigs attach to sugars by both a2,6-linkage (favoured as receptors by H1N1) and a2,3-linkage (favoured by H5N1). This makes pigs susceptible to infection by the H5N1 virus and by the pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. However, like humans, pigs do not easily transmit the H5N1 virus and it is not very pathogenic in pigs. Adapting the H5 HA to bind to a2,6-linked saccharides is likely to enhance transmission of H5 viruses between pigs.”
“Dogs and cats are also susceptible to H5N1 and A(H1N1)pdm09. Because humans have close contact with all three of these species, we need to be concerned about the possibility that the mutated H5 viruses may be transmitted to and from humans and any of these species. This could greatly complicate disease control. There are an estimated 2 billion domestic pigs globally. An influenza virus with high morbidity and mortality in pigs that could be transmitted between them could have a devastating effect on the world’s food supply; pigs would then serve as an intermediate host of virus adaptation to humans.”
I wonder what sort of ethics approval process these lethal flu virus studies went through?
It seems like somebody missed the big picture as far as ‘unintended consequences’ are concerned…
Elizabeth Hart
Australia February 19, 2012Consider these quotes from Paul Keim, acting chair of the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) from a Q&A in the Nature journal: “Reasons for proposed redaction of flu paper”. Nature. Vol. 482. 9 February 2012. 156-157:http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/482156a.html
“H5N1 has been in birds since at least 1996, and despite the almost 600 human infections of which we are aware, this virus has not yet become efficiently transmissible between mammals. There might be good reasons why it hasn't achieved this capacity, including inherent biological limitations.”
“The artificial evolution of a new mammal-adapted H5N1 virus, as reported in these two papers, has removed the natural barriers that might have existed. Accomplishing this in the lab, however, doesn't mean that it can occur naturally.”
“We also need to consider the potential role of, and impact on, other species. Pigs are a well-known ‘mixing vessel’ for influenza viruses. This mixing could lead to the emergence of new antigenically shifted viruses.”
Elizabeth Hart
Australia February 19, 2012It is incredible that the industry-funded Erasmus laboratory is actually involved in creating a supposedly ‘lethal flu virus’, in cahoots with the US National Institutes of Health.
So now we have the threat of a supposedly deadly virus. So what now after this fear-mongering? Is their intention to insist the entire world population be vaccinated against this lab-created virus? The Swine Flu pandemic was a flop, so they want to do a really good job next time and artificially engineer a more effective deadly virus and sell billions of vaccines? Really, you could not make this stuff up… (And have another look at the movie Contagion – pure fear-mongering propaganda for the CDC.)
What if this supposedly deadly virus escapes the lab and sickness and death ensue? Who will bear the moral and financial responsibility? The US/NIH? The scientists concerned? How does this lab created ‘deadly virus’ figure with the Biological Weapons Convention?
I have forwarded an open letter to the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) outlining my concerns about this matter, providing my perspective as a ‘layperson’. My open letter can be accessed via this link: http://bit.ly/AfyAtQ
I have also forwarded an email to Mr Peter Woolcott, Australia’s Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations and to the Conference on Disarmament, Geneva to query what position the Australian government is taking on this matter.
R. Ashok Kumar
India February 19, 2012In my comments (scroll down below) I have in effect pointed out many activities in modern civilization(mc) which will unleash not only flu, but a whole lot of other diseases and my work even puts numbers on some consequences. For example my work suggests that the cause of the 1918 American Flu Pandemic was dams. This present specialist research on flu is I feel just one more such activity of modern civilization(mc) all of which have to be labelled giant experiments affecting all life. Just look at ionising radiation and how it is affecting all life. And how IAEA and WHO are misleading the public on the effects. I feel there must be change from mc to one which recognises the truth: There is true knowledge, learn thou it is this: To see ONE changeless life in all the lives, in the separate the Inseparable. How about ionising radiation let loose by mc's nuclear fuel cycles leading to lowering one's immunity to fight diseases and cell damages? Crass commerce based on extraction of materials from the earth must be replaced by one based on truth. Extraction believes in imperfect knowledge: To see the separate existences apart, and falsely believing that is the truth. Civilization will thrive in health only when it recognises the importance of return of whatever has been taken from Mother Earth. Not creation of things new to nature like fission is doing making nuclear wastes impossible to be returned.
David Fedson
Sergy Haut, France February 19, 2012The debate over H5N1 research misses a larger point. Influenza viruses can and do develop more efficient transmissibility on their own; we've known this for decades. What's more important is to understand what we might do to reduce mortality when this happens. Immunomodulatory agents could probably be used to modify the host response to severe influenza and improve survival (Influenza Other Respi Virus 2009; 3: 129-42). Evidence that this happens was published recently. In a study of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza, statin treatment reduced mortality by 41% (J Infect Dis 2012; 205: 13-9). The reduction in mortality was in addition to any benefit that might have been due to previous influenza vaccination or antiviral treatment. Influenza scientists and the public health officials who listen to them have yet to understand the potential importance of these agents, yet if a highly virulent H5N1 virus gets loose, the vaccines and antivirals they're counting on won't be available in time to do much good. The issue we should be discussing is not whether to undertake or publish research on H5N1 influenza virus transmission; it's why we have failed to undertake laboratory and clinical research on immunomodulatory agents that could save lives. These agents are produced as generics in developing countries and could be used to treat anyone with access to basic health care. The cost of treating an individual patient would be less than one dollar.
Bob
Texas February 19, 2012The monkeys are playing with the matches. And they are standing knee deep in a pool of gasoline.
Cliff
Virginia February 18, 2012This is just the beginning. A time will come when someone in a lab develops a method for designing a virus to order, requiring only tabletop equipment. And they will want to publish that.
There will come a day - in this century - when a single individual will have the ability to wipe out all of humanity with a single act. All it will take is a single Ted Kaczynski, and poof, we will all vanish.
YK
Boston February 18, 2012Well the depopulationsist must be thrilled about this then again many of the work for the WHO...so the recipe for a deadly virus will be made public. which means theres a very good chnace someone, somewhere will replicate it. "One Less" isn't that the slogan? You'll see a lot of reference to the number One... As in "One World" Trade Center. Pay less attention to the words you hear (mostly lies) and pay more attention to the symbols that are all around you in commercials, advertisements, even in prints on the clothes your children wear... skull and cross bones also symbolize poison/ death...get it???? Lots of multi colored skull and cross bones. Kids LOVE to wear them but they are not so cute when you understand they have a more sinister meaning. Subliminal messages are everywhere. Open your eyes!!!
mcmiljr
MS February 18, 2012From a layman's perspective, I have to say that this research seems like a bad idea. Seems like it would be similar to say: "We want to know how to destroy the world, so we're going to figure out how and create a detailed blueprint, then publish it for everyone to see, because we want to understand how the world can be destroyed so we can recognize the process if and when it starts and then hopefully stop it." My mind has turned to 12 Monkeys, which is a really underrated movie by the way.
Christopher Alan Fields
Muncie Indiana USA February 18, 2012Don't be Surprised when there's a Deadly Flu Outbreak, just Remember this Day and Remember that the Government Created this Plague for a Reason. Check Out UN Agenda 21 to Move us All to Compact Cities and Return most of the Land back to Nature, the UN Also has Plans to Reduce the Population by 90 Percent or More.
InfoWars PrisonPlanet
JJ
US February 18, 2012Ok.... I agree that humans are self destructive and that no panel of experts has the right to make a decision that could affect us all; however, is there a way that these scientists can create a type of vaccine to reverse the effects of H5N1? Could that be a possible reason for the testing? Is there even a chance that someone could fabricate such a vaccine?
mg
usa February 18, 2012This ought to clear the earth of about 2 billion people. Only as good as the weakest link. Good Lord - what are they thinking?
clyde06
Baltimore, MD February 18, 2012Brave New World...Let the dead bury the dead (a time likely to arrive sooner than many think).
sweetjak
here February 18, 2012Sadly, there are some "scientists" who have no sense of the public welfare and public health. What was true with 19th and 20th century science may not be true in the 21st century. Should we continue to apply those early norms today?
James Sullivan
Chicago February 18, 2012Hopefully the work will lead to a head start on vaccine and antivirals effective against such a strain. I think it is a mathematically predictable event that a pandemic strain will arise as progeny of H5N1. Most persons knowledgeable about flu believe that nature will create such a virus soon. There are millions of farmers in Asia with pigs and birds kept together, and it is from one of these "laboratories" that the feared epidemic will arise. The Mexican strain turned out to be mercifully only a little bit more virulent that regular flu. Worse is coming. This research is part of our being ready when it inevitably occurs.
Wrusssr
NY February 18, 2012What if there are no terrorists and only hysteria-propaganda prepping the public's mind for a hidden agenda? What if the "original" swine flu pandemic was a hoax?
What if the new-improved swine flu is a hoax? What if it's to be used deliberately on citizens? Did you know that globalists own all of BigPharma's vaccine manufacturing plants and the WHO? Did you know globalists own all of the world's governments through their central banks that control these countries' money ? That BigPharma has been legislated immune from prosecution for damages and deaths cause by their vaccines? Did you know those wonderful folk who live on a rock north of Europe started all this? That uncle Rhodes left his fortune to study the "population problem" and come up with a "solution?" That there is no population problem? That developed country populations are already declining, and developing countries' populations are already leveling? That the world can feed 3-4 billion more people? That getting it to the people who need food is the problem? That by 2050 and beyond the world's population is projected to decline with replacement of ourselves becoming the problem?
It's really a good feeling, though, to see so many NY Times readers and so-called scientists and humans calmly debating madness like this.
Have a nice day.
JWWoida
Milwaukee February 18, 2012Those who want the Bird Flu information published are like those who would plant a land mine in forest because they can. After all, more people are likely to be injured by automobiles.
patty
sammamish,wa February 18, 2012When did it become alright that the world would become an experimental toy laboratory for a few mad scientists ? Haven't we learned by now that the human factor raises the likelihood of a dangerous outcome. " Too big to fail banks, " BP gulf spill, Enron, Fukushima, Katrina, Exon's spill, 9-11 ( who knew ? ), these are just some of the arrogant denials of man's lack of foresight to consider humanitie's frailties.
For the world's protection don't release and show this deadly information, it's playing Russian Roulette with the world's live's!
AmatureHistorian
NYC February 18, 2012The US is against publishing the discovery because the military has already militarized the virus for possible conflict with China. The Chinese of course is working on similar program in case the virus actually mutates and starts to spread through Southern China and Southeast Asia.
Richard McCardell
Rigby, ID, USA February 18, 2012I opt for the redacted version. Full publication is too dangerous. I am old enough to have had older relatives who died from the 1918 flu and I know how disastrous such deaths can b to the remaining families.
Eugene Gorrin
Union, NJ February 18, 2012Once the research is published, how long do you think it will be before the step-by-step "How to Create a Deadly Virus for Dummies" is published?
Gary Merrill
Oregon February 18, 2012The gist of the argument justifying the research and its publication seem to be: 1) "knowing the genetic changes that allow transmissibility will let us be better prepared to predict and combat transmissibility when it occurs in nature" and 2) "the genetic changes that can give rise to transmissibility are occuring in nature anyhow, so why be alarmed when the genetic changes are purposefully made in the laboratory." This seems oxymoronic. If transmissible viruses arise in nature, why aren't the genetic changes responsible for transmissability already identified by sequencing natural isolates. My second question is why purposefully engineered transmissibility needs to be studied using a deadly virus, rather than innocuous one. Obviously, it creates headlines; but what fundamentally is gained by changing a deadly non-contagious flu virus into a contagious one that could not be gained by using a non-deadly virus.
Probably, we will be lucky. Escape from the many labs doing copy cat work will not result in a worldwide contagion. If we are not lucky, there will almost certainly be survivors and they won't have to worry about global warming.
Collateral Damage
Lexington, MA February 18, 2012Like all science, this genie cannot be put back in the bottle, nor should it be. For every nefarious use that the ignorant and politically motivated can conjure up, there are orders of magnitude more benefits that accrue from our understanding of nature. A society that favors putting a handgun, whose intended purpose is killing, in every citizen's pocket cannot honestly censor research that helps us better understand life. Those who criticize this search for and dissemination of nature's secrets need to look in the mirror.
personne
virginia beach, virginia February 18, 2012And do we publish all the work-up to military plans?
163 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.