
Hedge fund managers heavily populate the so-called 1 percent in the United States. And they are getting richer.
The 25 highest-earning hedge fund managers in the United States took home a total of $21.15 billion in compensation in 2013, according to an annual ranking published on Tuesday by Institutional Investor’s Alpha magazine.
They earned that hefty sum in a year when most hedge fund managers fell short of the market’s returns. The multibillion-dollar payday is the highest since 2010, and it is 50 percent more than in 2012, according to the survey.
David A. Tepper, the 56-year-old founder of Appaloosa Management, maintained his spot atop the list, bringing in $3.5 billion last year, after earning $2.2 billion in 2012. Steven A. Cohen of SAC Capital Advisors ranked No. 2 after pocketing $2.4 billion, while John A. Paulson of Paulson & Company took home $2.3 billion, ranking No. 3.
The size of these paychecks are estimates based on the value of the managers’ stakes in their hedge funds and the fees they charge. Investors typically pay management fees of 2 percent of the total assets under management and 20 percent of the profits, or “2 and 20.”
Mr. Tepper returned 42 percent to investors in his flagship Appaloosa Investment I and Palomino funds, partly driven by big bets on formerly down-and-out airline stocks like Delta Air Lines and American Airlines, as well as financial and auto stocks.
While the fees they pay can vary, investors in Appaloosa typically follow the “2 and 20” pattern. A representative for Mr. Tepper declined to comment.
Mr. Paulson, who made his name betting against the housing market, generated returns of 63 percent in his Paulson Recovery fund after betting on the housing recovery and on unloved financial services stocks. His merger fund also made strong gains from smart wagers on deals in the telecommunications, biotechnology and health care sectors.
Paulson & Company takes a 1.5 percent management fee and 20 percent performance fee. A spokeswoman for Mr. Paulson declined to comment.
Mr. Cohen returned 20.1 percent to investors in his multibillion-dollar SAC Capital Advisors, and his paycheck was lifted by the 50 percent fee he charged them. He has been near the top of the rankings for all but one year of Institutional Investor’s survey, which has been compiled since 2002.
But it will most likely be Mr. Cohen’s last time on the list, which tracks managers who invest outside money. As part of an agreement with the government last year to plead guilty to securities fraud violations and pay a record $1.2 billion penalty, SAC agreed to close its doors to outside investors and manage only Mr. Cohen’s personal wealth. The firm has since changed its name to Point72 Asset Management.
A spokesman for Mr. Cohen declined to comment.
More remarkable than the size of the paychecks in 2013 were the multiples by which they have ballooned since Institutional Investor began collecting data on pay. During that period, the $2.7 trillion hedge fund industry has sought billions of dollars from the rich and from pension funds and endowments.
George Soros, the investor whose $1 billion bet against the British pound is said to have broken the Bank of England in 1992, was the biggest earner in the survey’s inaugural year, with $700 million in earnings, one-fifth of Mr. Tepper’s paycheck in 2013.
Daring bets that bring investors huge gains have helped justify the high terms, but lackluster returns in recent years have drawn criticism from many in the investing community.
For most hedge fund clients, 2013 was disappointing. It was the fifth consecutive year that hedge funds fell short of stock market performance, with the average fund returning 9.1 percent, according to a composite index of 2,200 portfolios collected by HFR, a firm that tracks the industry.
By comparison, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index soared 32.4 percent after accounting for dividends.
Some hedge fund titans took home large sums of money even as their investors were left with little to show, in large part because of the sheer size of the assets under management and the fees they charge.
Raymond Dalio, the 64-year-old founder of the world’s biggest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, earned $600 million. His funds gave investors returns of 3.5 percent to 5.3 percent. Mr. Dalio, whose views on the economy are closely watched, is also known for his 123-page Bridgewater manifesto called “Principles,” which espouses a Darwinian capitalism reminiscent of the works of Ayn Rand.
Mr. Dalio’s spokeswoman declined to comment.
As technology stocks soared in 2013, one cluster of hedge funds called the Tiger Cubs and their founders reaped generous payouts. Named after the hedge fund giant Tiger Management, these firms are run by former protégés of its founder, Julian H. Robertson Jr. They include Robert Citrone, an ex-wrestler and founder of Discovery Capital Management, who made $475 million; John Griffin of Blue Ridge Capital, who brought in $470 million; O. Andreas Halvorsen of Viking Global Investors, who earned $450 million; and Stephen F. Mandel Jr. of Lone Pine Capital, who pulled in $450 million.
But 2014 may not turn out to be as flush for some hedge fund managers. Since the start of the year, many of them have been dragged down by a market rout in the technology and biotechnology sectors.
Activist investors who buy stakes in companies to shake up management and change the business had a great 2013, as investors poured record levels of money into their funds.
Larry Robbins took home $750 million, and his firm, Glenview Capital Management, had the best returns of any hedge fund in the top 25. Mr. Robbins, who is not normally an activist investor and prefers to be called a “suggestivist,” led a successful proxy battle against Health Management Associates, providing a boon to investors. He also made big bets on health care companies like McKesson, HCA Holdings and Life Technologies. His flagship Glenview Capital fund gained 44.3 percent in 2013, while the Glenview Opportunity fund rose 101.7 percent.
A spokesman declined to comment.
Daniel S. Loeb, the acerbic activist who is best known for his tactic of wielding a poison pen at senior executives, made $700 million in 2013, and his Third Point hedge fund posted gains of 26 percent. On Monday, the target of one of Mr. Loeb’s proxy battles, Sotheby’s, announced it had reached an agreement with Mr. Loeb just one day ahead of what was poised to be a dramatic annual meeting.
Nelson Peltz, a co-founder of Trian Partners, reaped $375 million. The firm’s most successful bets were on Wendy’s, the manufacturer Ingersoll-Rand and Mondelez International, the owner of brands like Cadbury and Ritz. Trian Partners grew by $3.5 billion last year.
Spokeswomen for Mr. Loeb and Mr. Peltz declined to comment.
James G. Dinan, the founder of York Capital, a hedge fund that has often bought stakes in companies that are later singled out by activists but that typically stays on the sidelines, received $360 million in 2013. A spokeswoman for Mr. Dinan declined to comment.
With historic amounts of money flooding into the industry — investors put $63.7 billion into hedge funds last year alone — there will be no shortage of newly minted hedge fund millionaires and billionaires to come.
But for this list, all the highest earners were men. No women placed among the top 50.



145 Comments
josh f
nyc May 12, 2014"Then how about you zoom in on the top 0.1%. Still a lot of white guys who make a lot of money..."
—by Anne184
anne184: while i agree with the overall point you make, i'm pretty tired of the racism and sexism that allows people to think that it's never okay to refer to race and sex pejoratively—unless, of course, it's referring to white men.
i'm pretty sure that race and gender are not pertinent to the concerns and criticisms that people have of hedge funds and their managers.
let's say you got in a car crash and it was reported on the evening news. let's say you were identified as a "woman driver", or, to multiply the offense, an "asian woman driver". i'm guessing you'd have a problem with that.
and i, despite all the racism and sexism that must infect me and taint everything i do because i am, after all, just some white guy—i would also have a problem with that.
of course, the days of identifying someone as a "woman driver" are well behind us, and that has nothing to do with whether they are more or less likely to cause accidents than men drivers.
so if you think that's only as it should be (and i'd agree with you), then maybe you'd like to consider that it's only fair to refrain from using "white guys" as an epithet, and instead restrict your commentary to what is actually relevant.
Larry L
Dallas, TX May 12, 2014The so-called "innovation" in finance of the past generation was never about generating outcomes. It was always about generating INCOME for the financiers.
Hedge funds, private equity and VC has always been a new class of PAYSCALE and not about generating economic activity or creating new technologies. It is more clear than ever that the industry is an EXTRACTIVE one and NOT a CREATIVE one.
Those people who have pensions and universities with foundations should be demanding clawbacks for failure to perform and reductions in future share of profits of the financial managers.
M Powell
Pennsylvania May 12, 2014So... Do they have enough money yet? Have they extracted enough wealth out of society yet? I hope they don't think that I, in any way, look up to them, point to them in admiration, or anything like that. They make me sick. Maybe all this wealth they suck out of our economy could somehow be used to pay people a living wage for the hard ***work*** real people do ... Like in providing a service or making something or somehow contribute something to others. But that would be anti capitalist, huh? The rich get richer. I hope they are proud of themselves, because one else is.
Scott
Cincinnati May 12, 2014Tepper returned 42% to his investors?
That's an astounding return. He created lots and lots of wealth for his clients. He has been rewarded for his work.
think critically
Madison, WI May 9, 2014I love that no a one of these men would comment for this article. Even they must understand that what they take is indefensible.
LE
NY May 9, 2014I earned 13.2% on my (tiny) portfolio this year, and I did hardly anything except wonder what I should do. Not quite true, I managed to refrain from doing anything every time I had an idea. I am merely well diversified. I have no fancy incomprehensible investments either, no longs, no shorts, no derivatives, everything is very plain vanilla and I am a stay-at-home Mom. But I must lack entrepreneurial drive. The article says that Raymond Dalio gave his investors as much as 5.3%. Why on earth aren't I a hedge-funder earning $600 million? Hey, foolish folks who give Bridgewater your money, give to me instead! I'll charge you half what he does and be happy with paying myself $300 million. Really, who are the idiots who give Bridgewater their money?
PC
Chicago May 9, 2014As an employee of a hedge fund myself, it never ceases to amaze me how ordinarily well-informed, reasonable posters here suddenly adopt a vindictive mob mentality at the mention of hedge funds and their compensation.
We live in a capitalist system, within which it stands to reason that people will do everything legally possible to earn and retain every dollar they can. Over the last decade or so, our lawmakers have admittedly relaxed financial regulations and tax rates for the wealthy, making it even easier for managers such as Mr. Tepper to retain obscene amounts of money.
Throw tar at the funds and their managers all you want. Rhetoric such as "They shouldn't make that much" or "They should be in jail" is completely devoid of any relevant thought. This is the system our lawmakers, elected by you and your fellow Americans, have crafted. They've opened their pockets to financial lobbyists, and you continue to re-elect them. Where does the blame really lie?
think critically
Madison, WI May 9, 2014Let me see if I understand the premise of your argument. Are you saying that it isn't possible to be a hedge fund manager and have morals at the same time?
I for one am thankful for everyone who doesn't think wealth, and power, are the ultimate objectives of life.
jzshore
Paris, France May 9, 2014Dear PC --
You are overlooking the fact that there is now -- and has been for some time -- a huge disconnect between us, the people, and our government.
There are no outraged citizens, no crusading journalists, and only a pathetic Occupy movement that was quickly crushed.
Democracy has flown out the window; anything can happen now.
jzzy55
is a trusted commenter New England May 9, 2014I'd like to see a list of their philanthropic activities, because with that kind of money they could do a lot of good. They surely have all the servants, penthouses, vacation homes, private jets, private islands, jewels and cars a person and his family can have. How many have established foundations? I'm going to look that up.
Taylor
NC May 12, 2014Atleast Thomas Steyer does.
jzshore
Paris, France May 9, 2014Very interesting that all the spokesmen and spokeswomen declined to comment!
What can you say when you are running an obscene business that just manages to skirt the law?
KP
Summit May 9, 2014There are also no minorities on this list.
Noreen
Boston May 9, 2014Well, duh.
josh f
nyc May 12, 2014as that issue is apparently of concern to you, i'll go ahead and assume you've done at least some investigation as to the ethnic/racial backgrounds of those on the list.
if that's the case (as it should be for someone making such a claim), i guess you would know that some of the people on the list are jews—and jews are still a minority in this country, the last time i checked.
so either you didn't do very good research, or you are unware that jews are a minority. for someone who is concerned enough about minority representation to write in about this list, that ignorance is troubling.
to that extent, maybe there's actually other groups represented, as well. i don't know, because i haven't checked, because i don't really care whether a small list like the top-earning hedge fund managers represents all the demographic diversity of our country.
what—do you want to "solve" that with affirmative action?? are you arguing to include more minorities in this list? if so, how? after all, this list isn't about discriminatory hiring practices that can be rectified. (and are you also troubled by the lack of diversity among NBA players, for example?)
in my opinion, there are other things about hedge funds and the compensation levels of their managers that are far more worthy of attention. in other words, i'm more concerned about what is being done, than about the race or ethnicity or sex of who is doing it.
Chris
Arizona May 9, 2014So for the outrageous fee of 2% plus 20% of any gains but of course no refund for any losses most clients would have been better off in an index fund or ETF. What a deal!
How can rich people be so stupid? They almost deserve to be fleeced by these scoundrels.
Ellie Kesselman
Arizona May 8, 2014This is not capitalism, nor free markets:
"hedge fund titans took home large sums of money even as their investors were left with little to show".
RJIII
SC May 7, 2014Did anyone else notice that Mr. Tepper made $3,500,000,000 and still has a 1985 IBM monitor on his desk??? Call IT and get an upgrade!
Rosie
DC May 9, 2014It's an antique... A very expensive one ;-)
Richard Belstein
New York May 7, 2014I must say I laugh when I see Steve Cohen on the list.
This guy should be in jail ten times over.
and yet he's having a party.
do we have anyone to police the laws and do the right thing anymore???
everyone knows this is all wrong
sapienti sat
west philly May 7, 2014Tax the hell out of these parasitic money addicts. Their speculation-games are crushing the global economy and with it, lives and livelihoods. As Dalio's manifesto shows, it's anti-social and anti-democratic. Americans must begin to see this as something to rage and fight against, and not something to envy or aspire to.
Dr Steve
Ketchum, ID May 7, 2014Wonder how many of these guys oppose a minimum wage hike? My guess is quite a few.
This is the most obscene bunch of bloated fat bags ever to be assembled on a list.
Bob
Larchmont, NY May 7, 20142 and 20% businesses are a classic "one way bet", where the managers make unbelievable money when their stock picks are good, but don't lose money when they go bad. Anyone can see what a great deal it is for the hedge fund managers (and private equity and VCs, the other sectors where this practice is common).
When these 2 and 20% businesses were 5-10% of the market, it was at least possible for them to beat the market. Now that they are 40-60%, they simply ARE the market, and cannot possibly beat it in the aggregate. Indeed, for the past ten years they HAVE underperformed, especially after fees and notwithstanding the exceptions on this list.
So why do the trustees of our pension funds, college endowments, and charitable foundations continue to pour money into these uneconomic arrangements? Is it innocent naiveté, or have they been utterly co-opted by the promise of cushy Board seats at the companies controlled by these money men, invitations to Davos, and dinners at Le Bernadin?
Rosie
DC May 9, 2014Another definition for the 2 and 20 scheme (should be a scheme, just like Ponzi): Heads, I win. Tails, you loose.
Concerned Reader
Boston May 12, 2014You are uninformed.
Hedge funds manage about $2.1 trillion, across all asset classes (stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies). Yes that's a lot fo meony, but it's still a small fraction of the overall market.
John N.
Syracuse, New York May 6, 2014Just out of curiosity what have these people earned for their shareholders over say a ten year period stripping out the costs the shareholders incur?
John N.
Syracuse, New York May 7, 2014I meant adding in, not stripping out.
AHicks
San Francisco May 6, 2014I have no problem with people making loads of money WHEN IT IS THEIR OWN COMPANY. I do have a problem with CEO's and executives making tons of money on shareholder's dimes when they are basically figureheads and have been given their fortunes by their friendly board room cronies.
It is time for companies and executives and managers to answer to their customers, suppliers, associates, debtors, etc. The website, CircumSeeker.com, allows anyone to "circumseek" an organization via email to elicit a response to their questions. The organization is then rated based on how they respond (or do not respond), with the hopes it will compel an open dialogue between user and organization. It's a fairly effective web service to obtain answers to your questions (i.e. why do you think you should get paid that much?), and it's free to use.
Jess
New York May 6, 2014It is becoming increasingly meaningless to talk about the 1%. Those in the lower half of that strata live a life that, while advantaged, is at least recognizable to the people down the economic ladder. Particularly, because reaching the top 1% is not a steady state. People having six figures of taxable income still have to worry about funding education and retirement. On the other hand, earnings in the eight, nine and ten figure range buy a life that is beyond the imagination of most.
Jonathan
is a trusted commenter NYC May 6, 2014"Hedge fund managers heavily populate the so-called 1 percent in the United States."
Wrong! The top 1% consists of 3 million people. Only a few hundred of them are hedge fund managers.
Studies have shown that the best-represented professions in the top 1% are doctors, follow by lawyers, follow by non-financial business executives.
Anne184
Cambridge, MA May 9, 2014Then how about you zoom in on the top 0.1%. Still a lot of white guys who make a lot of money while creating/inventing nothing-- not even jobs. They can be philanthropic, yes-- but then we have so very few deciding what or who is deserving.
Concerned Reader
Boston May 12, 2014Actually about 10000 people are hedge fund managers.
Hedge fund managers income varies from low six figures to the 10 figures you see here.
planetary occupant
earth May 6, 2014I'm afraid that my thoughts on this topic are unprintable.
Andy
Iowa May 6, 2014I have found interesting ebook on Amazon "How to make great investment and trading decisions. New Way to Achieve Confidence and Increase You Profits" Michael White. The author refers to some experiment which proved that people make the best decisions if they use their intuition. He also describes how to apply this knowledge in trading and outperform other traders. It sounds a little bit crazy. But I am afraid. Maybe he really discovered something new? If this is true then other traders may learn his idea and beat us.
Richard Belstein
New York May 6, 2014Our institutions should be barred from dealing with Hedge Funds.
This is our money people.
Why are we paying 2 and 20% to manage it?
APJ
NY, NY May 6, 2014The best part of this article is looking over his shoulder at that monitor and speaker on his desk. Apparently when you pull down 3 and a half bricks you don't really care about your computer being from the 90s.
145 Comments